Joshua* used to start his school days bouncing off the walls. The 16-year-old, who attends the LEAP Program (Lifeskills and Education for Students with Autism and other Pervasive Developmental Disorders) at Baltimore's Kennedy-Krieger Institute, rides a bus for more than an hour to participate in the highly regarded day program. The long trip made Joshua so agitated that most of the first half of his day was spent calming him down.
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
Effects of a Snoezelen room on the behavior of three autistic clients
Snoezelen op maat, Wat zijn de mogelijkheden?
Door Miranda Minkenberg
Snoezelen kan ingezet worden als een benaderingswijze om d.m.v. actieve zintuigprikkeling een ingang te vinden in de belevingswereld van de leerlingen met ASS1. Door doelbewust te snoezelen is het mogelijk om de prikkelverwerking te stimuleren of juist af te remmen waar dat nodig is.
Children with autism often do not interact well with the world around them; being unable to understand events in their immediate surroundings and lacking any sense of an ability to control or direct events. This inability to interact inhibits their mental development; precisely the problem that MEDIATE was designed to help overcome.
MEDIATE
A Multisensory Environment Design for an Interface between Autistic and Typical Expressiveness
Problem
Young autistic children do not communicate with the rest of us and we do not have access to their autistic world and their autistic experience. Misunderstandings are at present mutual.
Aim
To design, produce, build, and validate an intelligent, immersive, multisensory, interactive environment that reacts to the unique user, and allows that user to create expressions of their own sensory experience: creations which can be replayed and communicated to others. This environment will be a transportable.
These experiments explored whether behavioral improvements observed during Snoezelen OT treatment sessions generalized beyond the session to two different settings for a person with moderate intellectual disability, autism and severe challenging behaviors. Experiment 1 explored engagement during a functional task immediately following the treatment sessions while Experiment 2 explored changes in the frequencies of two challenging behaviors on the days after treatment sessions. Investigators found generalization to both post-session engagement as well as to the daily frequency of two challenging behaviors on days following the OT sessions